FoWF Board Meeting Monday May 21 at 7PM

May 1st, 2012
The Friends of White Flint Board of Directors will hold a meeting on Monday, May 21, at 7PM at Federal Realty, 1626 E. Jefferson.
The meeting will feature a presentation on funding future FoWF activities through an increase in membership contributions, and a proposal from a vendor to provide services to manage and operate FoWF for the next year. Absent these plans for funding and operations or some reasonable alternative, FoWF will likely go dormant or cease to operate.
The meeting is open to the public, and you are encouraged to participate in the discussions.

As always, thanks for your support.
Barnaby Zall

Bethesda Magazine Article on White Flint

March 1st, 2012

http://www.bethesdamagazine.com/Bethesda-Magazine/March-April-2012/In-Like-Flint/index.php?cparticle=1&siarticle=0#artanc

Bike Sharing in White Flint? McDoT Forum Nov. 29

November 23rd, 2011

Bike sharing is a new concept similar to Zip-Car and other automobile-sharing programs. You rent a bike for a period of time from a public location and return it when you’re done. Red bike sharing sites are popping up across the Washington area.

In Montgomery County, bike sharing programs are envisioned in Rockville and Shady Grove. The new White Flint, with its increased bicycle-friendly mobility structure, would also be a good place for bike sharing.

Now the Montgomery County Dept. of Transportation is soliciting comments on new bike sharing locations. Here’s their announcement:

Bikesharing Locations: Your Input Needed

 The Montgomery County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) invites public input on bikesharing locations and opportunities in the area of the county stretching from the D.C. line to the Beltway along the Metrorail Red Line including, Takoma Park, Silver Spring, Forest Glen, & Wheaton on the East Leg, and Friendship Heights, Bethesda, and Medical Center along the West Leg.

 Public Forum: Please attend a public open house on Tuesday, November 29, from 6:00pm–8:30pm, to provide your comments on the County’s grant application to the Maryland Department of Transportation to obtain funding for this bikesharing initiative. The event will take place in the lobby auditorium of the Executive Office Building, 101 Monroe Street in Rockville, a short walk from the Metrorail Red Line’s Rockville station.

 What to Expect: The meeting will consist of a short presentation on bikesharing and an open house to solicit input on locations for bikesharing stations in that area.

 Background: This effort is part of a larger MCDOT initiative to institute bikesharing throughout Montgomery County to increase options for non-automobile travel.

 Questions: Email mcdot.CommuterServices@montgomerycountymd.gov.

 McDoT, with its “auto is king” mentality, has long been a thorn in the side of New Urbanism activists, putting, for example, nearly-useless surface parking lots in White Flint when there are lots of other possibilities. http://blog.friendsofwhiteflint.org/2010/04/28/from-the-people-who-brought-you-more-surface-parking-in-white-flint/

It’s good to see McDoT waking up to alternatives to the car.

Barnaby Zall

$6,666.67 per page White Flint Amenities Wish List Report is now Available

November 17th, 2011

In June, the Montgomery County Department of General Services held two meetings to receive public input on the location and exact description of the public amenities proposed in the White Flint Sector Plan. http://blog.friendsofwhiteflint.org/2011/05/23/white-flint-charettes-june-1-16/. The charettes followed months of controversy about the consulting contract, and especially the cost. http://blog.friendsofwhiteflint.org/2011/04/12/do-you-know-who-youre-hiring-april-11-meeting-of-white-flint-implementation-committee/, http://blog.friendsofwhiteflint.org/2011/04/13/diane-schwartz-jones-responds-to-concerns-about-public-amenities-charette-process/.

The consulting contract was for $100,000. The report was finally released today, and can be found at:

http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/content/DGS/DBDC/RegionalProjectPages/BethesdaProjects/Resources/WF-Final-Report.pdf.

The report is brief, with 15 pages and lots of tables in the appendices, but essentially boils down to a list of features requested by residents, with some comments by the county agencies and property owners who will have to build and maintain the amenities. Notably, the “wish list” of features in the tables in the appendices are not coordinated with the property owners’ development plans; for example, the residents asked for “children’s sailing ponds,” which last night’s White Flint Mall presentation showed would likely already be available in the “Piazza” portion of the 43.5 acre site.

Still, there are some interesting suggestions in the report.

Barnaby Zall

White Flint Implementation Committee Meeting Nov 14

November 4th, 2011

From Nkosi Yearwood, chief planner for White Flint:

The November meeting of the White Flint Implementation Advisory is scheduled for Monday, November 14 at 7:30 p.m. at Wall Local Park (5900 Executive Blvd). The proposed sketch plan for White Flint Mall is the main agenda item.

Nkosi Yearwood (c) chairing April 11 WFIC meeting, with (from left) Mike Coveyou of the County Executive's Office, Jacob Sesker of the Planning Department and Dave Freishtat, Co-Chair of WFIC (and FoWF Board Member)

Barnaby Zall

 

 

We Like Meetings So Much We’re Having Another

October 25th, 2011
The Board of Directors of Friends of White Flint met last night to discuss the future of the organization; several other members of the community also attended the meeting. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss proposals that FoWF join with or evolve into some other organization or entity; some of the proposed organizations included Business Improvement Districts, Urban Districts, the B-CC Chamber of Commerce, or one of the various County advisory groups. The group also discussed proposals to revise and improve FoWF’s web portals, including the FLOG.
 
The consensus of the group (indeed, unanimity) was that FoWF should not join with a County or other entity. The group wants FoWF to stay an independent voice joining the three major segments of the White Flint community: residents, businesses and property owners.
 
At the same time, the group recognized that FoWF cannot continue the level of activity it had during the development and enactment of the White Flint Sector Plan without adding staff, which, of course, requires adding more funds. The same is true of the web portals, which require more attention than our volunteer staff can give.
 
It was a very active discussion, lasting two hours. This discussion was, however, too significant and large to be completed last night.
 
The Board decided to hold another meeting to continue these discussions. The meeting will be held on Wednesday, November 16, 2011, beginning at 6PM, at the offices of Federal Realty, 1626 E. Jefferson St., Rockville.
 
The meeting, like all FoWF meetings, will be open to the public. You do not need to be on the Board to actively participate in the meeting. I encourage everyone to attend and participate.
 
Barnaby Zall

Change is Good

October 12th, 2011

The Friends of White Flint Board of Directors decided last night to hold a meeting to discuss the future of the organization and its web sites. The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held on Monday, October 24, at 7PM, at the offices of Federal Realty, 1626 East Jefferson in Rockville.

February 16 FoWF Board Meeting

 Background:
FoWF started in 2007 principally to promote the development of a White Flint Master Plan designed to convert the area into a transit-oriented, sustainable, pedestrian-friendly urban center. The White Flint Master Plan was adopted in March 2010, and the required enacting legislation was finalized in July of this year. The County Council, FoWF and many others celebrated White Flint being “open for business” on July 22. http://blog.friendsofwhiteflint.org/2011/07/27/white-flint-open-for-business/.
 
In 2010 and again this year, the FoWF Board discussed whether and how to continue FoWF after its first goal was achieved. The Board decided that there was a role for an advocacy group to monitor and comment on implementation plans, and none of the other groups organized by various County agencies filled the same role as the non-profit and independent FoWF.
 
Nevertheless, in part because of tremendous pressure from recent budget crises and in part because, frankly, I have been remiss in keeping up the website, several groups, including some County organizations, have asked to join with FoWF in the website, or in other activities.
 
The Proposals:
There have been several proposals of varying types: some suggest that FoWF take over certain roles in White Flint implementation, such as forming the nucleus for a Business Improvement District; others suggest that FoWF partner with a county body, such as the White Flint Urban District, to promote White Flint as a destination; still others simply ask that we let the County take over the whiteflint.org web site.
 
Reaction to the Proposals:
Reactions to the first set of proposals, when broached to Friends and Directors, were heated. Just a few selections:
Councilmember Nancy Floreen: “I would urge you to consider this move carefully. If you merge with a government entity, the Friends lose their flexibilty and identity and probably creativity. You become government, which is not as agile as the private sector would permit. I think that would be a great loss.”

Councilmember Nancy Floreen (L), Dan Hoffman and the Hoffman kids at the "White Flint Is Open For Business" Celebration

 
Former Planning Board Vice-Chair John Robinson: “What if you all do not agree with what the government wants to do, such as shift social or amenity costs to the private sector that were not contemplated by the White Flint sector plan. What if the opposite occurs, that the “government” proposes to cut back on its own commitments to amenities, transportation funding, etc. At that point disagreeing with the government and supporting the private sector (business or citizens in general) becomes very awkward if the government has voting representatives on the Board.”
Randolph Civic Association head Dan Hoffman: “I feel like having one dialogue about it would be healthy at this point.”
FoWF Co-Chair for Residents Suzanne Hudson: “The role of Friends may change because of the Urban District but the need for its input outside of the governmental process could be critical. Part of that is being a counter point to the county government.”

Suzanne Hudson, FoWF Co-Chair for Residents

 
My view:
I am the founder and chief bottlewasher for FoWF. I am not taking any position on any of the proposed options. I will point out that FoWF will not be able to continue into the future without some sort of support staff, which would affect all of the proposals. In other words, some change will happen; the question is what change would be best.
 
This meeting is to begin the process of evaluating these proposals. Ken Hartman, head of the Regional Service Center for White Flint, will be there to discuss one option; I believe others will discuss the other options.
 
I urge you all to attend the October 24 meeting.
 
Barnaby Zall
Co-Chair for Business

Busy Tuesday Night at the MAC

October 6th, 2011
The White Flint Implementation Committee (WFIC) will hold its October monthly meeting at the Montgomery Aquatic Center in Wall Park (Nicholson Lane and Executive Blvd.) at 7:30PM on Tuesday, October 11. (The meeting is on a Tuesday instead of the usual Monday because of the Columbus Day holiday.)
 
Nkosi Yearwood, chief White Flint planner for the Montgomery Planning Board, advises that the WFIC will discuss the County’s public facilities plan as well as the latest development updates. One can also expect discussion of the County Council’s surprisingly-long discussion of changes to the CR Zone, and perhaps some discussion of the future of citizen participation.

Nkosi Yearwood (c) chairing April 11 WFIC meeting, with (from left) Mike Coveyou of the County Executive's Office, Jacob Sesker of the Planning Department and Dave Freishtat, Co-Chair of WFIC (and FoWF Board Member)

Prior to the meeting, Federal Realty will be presenting some changes in its plans for Mid-Pike Plaza. Not sure what they are, but Evan Goldman suggests that they are “minor.” Federal Realty is seeking community input on the changes before offering them to the Planning Board for review.

Mid-Pike Plaza

Artist's Rendition of planned Mid-Pike Plaza, courtesty Federal Realty

And after the meeting, the Friends of White Flint Board of Directors will hold a brief, informal meeting to discuss a process for considering and evaluating various proposals for the community organization’s interaction with the County government and the Planning Board. Some have suggested that the website whiteflint.org be operated by, or in conjunction with, the County; others have proposed that FoWF itself become closer to one or more County agencies.

Reaction to the proposals has been mixed. County Councilmembers and others who have reacted to these plans have cautioned against losing the organization’s independent voice. So the FoWF Board is trying to determine how to proceed on these suggestions. Tuesday’s meeting will just determine whether a FoWF meeting is warranted and set a schedule.

Barnaby Zall

The New Tysons Corner vs The New White Flint

September 25th, 2011

Today’s Washington Post has an extensive Business section article on the history and planning for the revitalization of Tysons Corner Center in Fairfax County, Virginia. The article explains that Tysons blossomed from the confluence of several trends: regional retail magnets, booming government contracting businesses, and a lack of zoning that permitted the car to remain king.

Tysons Corner -- from BeyondDC.com

From the beginnings of the White Flint Sector Plan in 2006, many of us involved in the planning process for White Flint looked to Tysons for lessons, both good and bad. The report of the Montgomery County Planning Board’s White Flint Advisory Group was expressly modeled on a similar report from a similar citizens’ group looking at Tysons’ plans for renovation.

Many of the same concepts appear in both Plans: mixed-use developments; transit-centered planning and a reduction in the role of the automobile; sustainability; and more attention to pedestrian safety and convenience. Both Plans want to retain the retail engine that drives the local economy while building new communities. Some of the same faces are behind both Plans, notably the Lerner Corporation, which launched Tysons Corner Center in the 1960′s and is helping to drive the White Flint Plan today.

Francine Waters, Lerner Representative to Friends of White Flint

And there are major differences between the two: Tysons is much bigger. Tysons features new Metro lines, a massive investment designed to help remedy a woeful dependence on the automobile. White Flint expressly integrates the surrounding communities.

But perhaps one major difference can explain a lot: Tysons does not have the unified group of major landowners that White Flint does. As a result, White Flint is built on a new “skeleton” of roads and infrastructure, essentially remaking the area. Tysons, despite having new Metro assets, still fights with developers about breaking up the “superblocks” that are the main impediment to pedestrian safety and convenience. As a result, White Flint is much more pedestrian-friendly, much more likely to ease traffic congestion, and perhaps much more likely to gain the spark of spontaneous combustion to generate the feeling of a new town.

So it will be interesting to see what happens as Tysons spends a lot of its energy on internal friction, where White Flint can be more nimble. It’s an old story: big inertia providing the impetus to power through obstacles vs the smaller, but more flexible competitor. Apple vs IBM, anyone?

Barnaby Zall

Mid-Pike Plaza Preliminary Plan and Phase 1 Site Plan

September 9th, 2011

Mid-Pike Plaza

Thank you to everyone who has attended one of the Preliminary and Site Plan presentations about Federal Realty’s upcoming redevelopment of Mid-Pike Plaza.  We appreciate the community support that we have received for our plan, and we are excited to deliver a new place to live, work, shop, dine, and be entertained in the heart of Montgomery County.  For those who have not had a chance to see our presentation, we have made the slides available at:
http://www.federalrealty.com/media/leasing_kit_documents/Mid-Pike-Site-Plan-Presentation.pdf

Thanks for your continued support, and we look forward sharing more as our plans evolve.

Best,

Tommy Mann, Federal Realty Investment Trust
midpike@federalrealty.com