Archive for May 1st, 2009

White Flint Partnership Speaker Series

Friday, May 1st, 2009

Thank you to everyone who worked so hard to create the speaker series this morning.  Chris Zimmerman and Ian Lockwood both shared some of the best examples of planning around the nation, and they were incredibly engaging speakers.  I was impressed by the way transportation planning and urban planning are coordinated seemlessly in each of these great places!   Thank you to Friends of White Flint and the Chamber for their sponsorship and for getting so many people to attend.  Thank you to Francine Waters and Alison Mosle for their strategic oversite and management of the event.  We were really pleased by the number of local residents from at least 9 different civic associations.  Montgomery Cable Television will be producing their work shortly and we will have it available on the White Flint Partnership website at www.whiteflintpartnership.com.  If you have any questions in the meantime, please feel free to post a comment and we will get back to you as soon as possible!

Evan

Design Guidelines Debut

Friday, May 1st, 2009

One of the innovations of the White Flint Sector Plan process was the use of “design guidelines” to supplement traditional master plan development. The Planning Board describes the Design Guidelines as: “White Flint Design Guidelines make specific recommendations for streets, open spaces and buildings within the White Flint Sector Plan. The draft guidelines promote an attractive and successful public realm defined by streets, open spaces, and attractive buildings.” Now the Planning Board is using design guidelines in a variety of projects.

The White Flint Guidelines have been promised for years, and now they have finally appeared, in an attractive, photograph-illustrated version, available here:

http://www.montgomeryplanning.org/community/whiteflint/documents/WFDesignGuidelines_090501v2_opt.pdf

The White Flint Steering Committee is scheduled to discuss the Guidelines on Tuesday, May 5, at 7PM in the Silver Spring auditorium, 8787 Georgia Avenue.

Proposed FoWF Letter to Planning Board

Friday, May 1st, 2009

The Montgomery Planning Board’s refusal yesterday to consider the Rockville Pike redesign offered by influential transportation consulting firm Glatting-Jackson continues to roil discussion of the White Flint Sector Plan. Various organizations are staking out positions on the rejection, and the White Flint Steering Committee reportedly is nearing unanimity in opposing the rejection. The Planning Board has scheduled an additional worksession for Monday night, May 4, at 7PM to consider additional transportation options.

Friends of White Flint, which represents the largest community organizations, employers and property owners in White Flint as well as many other equally-valuable members, will likely also weigh in on the decision.

I have prepared a draft letter to the Board outlining a specific issue with the rejection of the Pike redesign. I invite your comments on the draft. The FoWF Board of Directors will likely consider this draft or some other response by Monday, so if you intend to comment, please do so immediately.

Draft Letter to Planning Board on Rockville Pike Design

Barnaby Zall

Speakers’ Series Begins with Arlington and the Pike

Friday, May 1st, 2009

The Friends of White Flint co-sponsored a presentation this morning on “New Urbanism” and “smart growth.” The speakers were Chris Zimmerman, a dynamic speaker who is on the Arlington County (Va.) Board, had been on their planning board, and is on the Metro Board (he just stepped down as Chairman of Metro), and Ian Lockwood, a principal in the walkability and transportation planning firm of Glatting-Jackson of Orlando, Florida. The auditorium at Dave & Buster’s at White Flint Mall (I didn’t even know they had an auditorium, but they do, behind the restaurant and away from the games) was pretty much full, with almost 100 attendees. The presentations will be shown on Montgomery County Cable next week. www.accessmontgomery.tv.

Don Briggs, from Federal Realty and the White Flint Partnership which sponsored the session, moderated, opening with a discussion of White Flint. Then Chris Zimmerman took the stage. He pointed out that his kids are never impressed when he goes out to speak, but that they will be when they heard he spoke at Dave & Buster’s.

Zimmerman’s presentation focussed on Arlington and its development of two Metrorail-oriented corridors and two non-Metro-connected areas. He pointed out that, as a result of its smart growth policies, Arlington has quadrupled its density but traffic congestion has decreased. Arlington has much lower car ownership and higher transit useage rates than comparable areas around Washington, D.C., even though the income levels are quite high. Arlington, he was quite proud to say, also has the lowest tax rate in the D.C. area, since the high-density areas (1/10 of the county) provide 1/2 of the county’s revenue. Outside the county limits, about 58% of Metro riders take cars to the stations, but within Arlington County 73% get to Metro on foot. Even off-peak Metro ridership is high within Arlington.

Yet despite boosting density substantially within the planned corridors, just outside the corridors, the “density is the same as 50 years ago, with single-family houses and older neighborhoods. It was the deal we made: preserve the neighborhoods a quarter-mile away from Metro.”

Zimmerman stressed three principles for smart growth:

1) The “vital 1/4 mile.” 75% of transit riders will come from that 1/4 mile. Others might say they will walk further, but the reality is that 90% comes from 1/2 mile. Going from 1/4 mile to 1/2 mile results in a much bigger area but only a few more riders. “1/4 mile is a reality. Don’t waste it.”

2) Mixed use. The neighborhoods only work if they are mixed-use, so you get an “18-hour day, which makes better use of your investment in transit.” Mixed-use involves commercial, retail, and residential in the same 1/4 mile radius.

3) Designed for pedestrians. “If it isn’t walkable, it isn’t workable.” Arlington replaced a focus on the automobile with a focus on pedestrians, and new communities bloomed.

Zimmerman closed with an answer to a question about how to pay for all these changes, by pointing out that Arlington made deals with developers: “We’re not ‘exacting’ anything. We’re making you an offer. You can take it, and end up with a beautiful place, or you can leave it, and end up with what you have now.”

Ian Lockwood then spoke, discussing the changes in transit planning over the years and how that could be translated to the White Flint area. “As traffic engineers, we’ve had to broaden our perspectives to include pedestrians, greenhouse gasses, and other things. It’s all about urban design now, not just highways.” Lockwood compared “efficient” and “inefficient” cities around the word: “Houston uses more energy and land than any other city in the history of the world.” It is the most inefficient cities which are expanding highways instead of using smart growth palnning. The efficient cities are going “multi-modal.”

The change carries over into transportation planning. “It’s the use that determines whether a street is good for a neighborhood. Even if you have only five cars on a street, you won’t let your kids play there if the cars are going 55 miles an hour.” Slow streets, where the key mode in urban design is pedestrian, is the efficient, smart growth.  Good design removes blockages to improve traffic; a robust street network is essential to moving traffic, instead of the older pattern of cul-de-sacs and single entries to major highways. You need to bring stores back to the street, instead of hiding them behind parking lots. “You get what you buy. If you’re buying mixed-use, then that’s what you’ll get.”

Is FoWF a front for developers?

Friday, May 1st, 2009

At this morning’s Speakers’ Series (which was a great success, by the way), a Friends of White Flint member told me that someone suggested that FoWF was dominated by developers. I blinked, and then pointed out that:

at almost all of our Board meetings this year, 60% or more of the Directors present were “residents” and not affiliated with developers;

the vast majority of our members are residents or businesses which are not developers;  

until this year, none of our funds had come from developers and we had no developers as members; and

only one-third of our Directors are affiliated with developers (and all of those are publicly-disclosed and very active in the White Flint planning process; we’re very pleased to have them participate with us).

I started Friends of White Flint in 2007, and I am a tax-exempt organization (charities and political organizations) lawyer, with no practice in real estate, and no clients in real estate, much less developers. By far the most involved people in Friends of White Flint have been residents, community groups, bicycle groups, and businesses (when I say businesses, I include the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a federal agency which is a member in that group). So, no, I’d say that we aren’t dominated by developers.

We want participation by ALL groups in White Flint. It’s what we do: encourage dialogue among “stakeholders.” So we work with any group that wants to talk about White Flint; that includes the White Flint Partnership, which does include property owners and developers, and with which we have co-sponsored events to reach out to the public. Like today’s Speakers Series.

Barnaby Zall